(Dis-)solving the puzzle of the arrow of radiation

British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 51 (3):381-410 (2000)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I criticize two accounts of the temporal asymmetry of electromagnetic radiation - that of Huw Price, whose account centrally involves a reinterpretation of Wheeler and Feynman's infinite absorber theory, and that of Dieter Zeh. I then offer some reasons for thinking that the purported puzzle of the arrow of radiation does not present a genuine puzzle in need of a solution.

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1093/bjps/51.3.381

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

The Arrow of Radiation.Mathias Frisch - 2005 - In Inconsistency, asymmetry, and non-locality: a philosophical investigation of classical electrodynamics. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 103-120.
The asymmetry of radiation: Reinterpreting the Wheeler-Feynman argument.Huw Price - 1991 - Foundations of Physics 21 (8):959-975.
Understanding the Time‐Asymmetry of Radiation.Jill North - 2003 - Philosophy of Science 70 (5):1086-1097.
Absorbing the Arrow of Electromagnetic Radiation.Mario Hubert & Charles T. Sebens - 2023 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 99 (C):10-27.
Absorber and Entropy Theories of Radiation.Mathias Frisch - 2005 - In Inconsistency, asymmetry, and non-locality: a philosophical investigation of classical electrodynamics. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 121-144.
The Retardation Condition.Mathias Frisch - 2005 - In Inconsistency, asymmetry, and non-locality: a philosophical investigation of classical electrodynamics. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 145-164.
The philosophical underpinning of the absorber theory of radiation.Marco Forgione - 2020 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 72 (C):91-106.
The arrow of electromagnetic time and the generalized absorber theory.John G. Cramer - 1983 - Foundations of Physics 13 (9):887-902.
Inconsistency, asymmetry, and non-locality: a philosophical investigation of classical electrodynamics.Mathias Frisch - 2005 - New York: Oxford University Press.
What is the Problem about the Time‐Asymmetry of Thermodynamics?—A Reply to Price.Jill North - 2002 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 53 (1):121-136.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
296 (#146,497)

6 months
72 (#139,051)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Photo of Mathias Frisch
Mathias Frisch
Universität Hannover

Citations of this work

Reversing the arrow of time.Bryan W. Roberts - 2022 - Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
The Metaphysics of Scientific Realism.Brian Ellis - 2010 - Montreal: McGill-Queen's University Press.
‘The Most Sacred Tenet’? Causal Reasoning in Physics.Mathias Frisch - 2009 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 60 (3):459-474.
Theories: Tools versus models.Mauricio Suárez & Nancy Cartwright - 2008 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 39 (1):62-81.
Against fields.Dustin Lazarovici - 2017 - European Journal for Philosophy of Science 8 (2):145-170.

View all 72 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Time’s arrow and Archimedes’ point.Huw Price - 1996 - Philosophical and Phenomenological Research 59 (4):1093-1096.
Price on the Wheeler-feynman theory.Stephen Leeds - 1994 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 45 (1):288-294.
Reinterpreting the Wheeler—Feynman Absorber Theory: Reply to Leeds.Huw Price - 1994 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 45 (4):1023-1028.

View all 6 references / Add more references