Moving to CSR: What to Packfor the Trip

Business and Society 37 (1):40-59 (1998)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The study of Social Issues in Management (SIM) has exhausted its primary analytic framework based on corporate social performance (social science), business ethics (philosophy), and stakeholder theory (organizational science), and needs to move to a new paradigmatic level based on the natural sciences. Doing so would expand research horizons to include cosmological perspectives (astrophysics), evolutionary theory (biology, genetics, ecology), and non-sectarian spirituality concepts (theological naturalism, cognitive neuroscience). Absent this shift, SIM studies risk increasing irrelevance for scholars and business practitioners.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Stakeholder Management and Issues Management: Distinct or Overlapping CSP Processes of Corporate Social Responsiveness?Mary J. Mallott - 1995 - Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 6:1297-1305.
The Distinction of Fields.Barry M. Mitnick - 2019 - Business and Society 58 (7):1309-1333.
Toward a Unified Theory of the CSP–CFP Link.Isaiah Yeshayahu Marom - 2006 - Journal of Business Ethics 67 (2):191-200.
CSR Research.Jean Pasquero - 2017 - Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 28:213-223.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-03-24

Downloads
131 (#342,002)

6 months
62 (#149,388)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?