Democritus on Being and Ought: Some Remarks on the Existential Side of Early Greek Atomism

AKROPOLIS: Journal of Hellenic Studies 2:67-84 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

According to Democritus' anthropogeny is a microcosmic consequence within the process of cosmogony. However, the case of man is a peculiarity: man, this atom complex, is well aware of himself, yet is not aware of what he must do. Man does not naturally do that which promotes the harmonious ordering of his atoms. We must create a second nature. Now it becomes possible for us to be as we must be according to our first nature. Democritus is the is first thinker who explains to us what our nature is and who, from our being, derives an ought: he who wishes to do the right thing for both himself and others finds himself subject to the ought requirement to do that which brings the most calm to the atoms. This is a direct connection between being and ought, an extravagant mechanical existentialism.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-01-31

Downloads
111 (#438,255)

6 months
30 (#298,532)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Björn Freter
Towson University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations