- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Unpredictable robots elicit responsibility attributions
Behavioral and Brain Sciences 46:e30 (2023)
Abstract
Do people hold robots responsible for their actions? While Clark and Fischer present a useful framework for interpreting social robots, we argue that they fail to account for people's willingness to assign responsibility to robots in certain contexts, such as when a robot performs actions not predictable by its user or programmer.Author's Profile
Other Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
A neurocognitive view on the depiction of social robots.Ruud Hortensius & Eva Wiese - 2023 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 46:e38.
Social robots as social learning partners: Exploring children's early understanding and learning from social robots.Amanda Haber & Kathleen H. Corriveau - 2023 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 46:e36.
Of children and social robots.Elizabeth J. Goldman, Anna-Elisabeth Baumann & Diane Poulin-Dubois - 2023 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 46:e35.
On the moral responsibility of military robots.Thomas Hellström - 2013 - Ethics and Information Technology 15 (2):99-107.
Children's interactions with virtual assistants: Moving beyond depictions of social agents.Lauren N. Girouard-Hallam & Judith H. Danovitch - 2023 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 46:e34.
Fictional emotions and emotional reactions to social robots as depictions of social agents.Jonas Blatter & Eva Weber-Guskar - 2023 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 46:e24.
Moral Responsibility of Robots and Hybrid Agents.Raul Hakli & Pekka Mäkelä - 2019 - The Monist 102 (2):259-275.
Applying a Social-Relational Model to Explore the Curious Case of hitchBOT.Keith Miller, Marty Wolf & Frances Grodzinsky - 2019 - In Matteo Vincenzo D'Alfonso & Don Berkich, On the Cognitive, Ethical, and Scientific Dimensions of Artificial Intelligence. Springer Verlag. pp. 311-323.
Robots, Autonomy, and Responsibility.Raul Hakli & Pekka Mäkelä - 2016 - In Johanna Seibt, Marco Nørskov & Søren Schack Andersen, What Social Robots Can and Should Do: Proceedings of Robophilosophy 2016. IOS Press. pp. 145-154.
Taking a strong interactional stance.Frank Förster, Frank Broz & Mark Neerincx - 2023 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 46:e29.
Analytics
Added to PP
2023-04-07
Downloads
101 (#505,184)
6 months
33 (#270,762)
2023-04-07
Downloads
101 (#505,184)
6 months
33 (#270,762)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
References found in this work
Group Agency and Artificial Intelligence.Christian List - 2021 - Philosophy and Technology (4):1-30.
Responsibility and the ‘Pie Fallacy’.Alex Kaiserman - 2021 - Philosophical Studies 178 (11):3597-3616.
The Retribution-Gap and Responsibility-Loci Related to Robots and Automated Technologies: A Reply to Nyholm.Roos de Jong - 2020 - Science and Engineering Ethics 26 (2):727-735.
Try MATCHA Writer if you're interested in citing directly from PhilPapers and certifying your authorship.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation