Should concretists part with mereological models of the incarnation?

In Anna Marmodoro & Jonathan Hill, The Metaphysics of the Incarnation. Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press USA (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

More on The Decidability of Mereological Theories.Hsing-Chien Tsai - 2011 - Logic and Logical Philosophy 20 (3):251-265.
Decidability of mereological theories.Hsing-Chien Tsai - 2009 - Logic and Logical Philosophy 18 (1):45-63.
No Simples, No Gunk, No Nothing.Sam Cowling - 2014 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 95 (1):246-260.
Mereology and modality.Gabriel Uzquiano - 2014 - In Shieva Kleinschmidt, Mereology and Location. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 33-56.
The Metaphysics of the Incarnation.Anna Marmodoro & Jonathan Hill (eds.) - 2011 - Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press USA.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-04-03

Downloads
3 (#2,297,442)

6 months
3 (#1,846,442)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Tom Flint
University of Notre Dame

Citations of this work

On the metaphysics of the incarnation.Joshua R. Sijuwade - 2024 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 95 (2):153-185.
Recent Work on Molinism.Ken Perszyk - 2013 - Philosophy Compass 8 (8):755-770.

View all 18 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references