- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Uneasy companions
Ratio 22 (3):359-368 (2009)
Abstract
A critical notice of Terence Cuneo's The Normative Web and Hallvard Lillehammer's Companions in Guilt: Arguments for Ethical Objectivity.Author's Profile
Other Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
Uneasy companions: language and human collectivities in the remaking of Chinese society in the early twentieth century.Jeffrey Weng - 2020 - Theory and Society 49 (1):75-100.
Companions in guilt: Arguments for ethical objectivity – Hallvard Lillehammer.Andrew Fisher - 2009 - Philosophical Quarterly 59 (235):379-382.
Review: Hallvard Lillehammer: Companions in Guilt: Arguments for Ethical Objectivity. [REVIEW]Terence Cuneo - 2009 - Mind 118 (470):492-497.
Companions in Guilt: Arguments in Metaethics.Christopher Cowie & Rach Cosker-Rowland (eds.) - 2020 - Routledge.
Companions in guilt: entailment, analogy, and absorbtion.Hallvard Lillehammer - 2020 - In Christopher Cowie & Rach Cosker-Rowland, Companions in Guilt: Arguments in Metaethics. Routledge.
Rescuing Companions in Guilt Arguments.Rach Cosker-Rowland - 2016 - Philosophical Quarterly 66 (262):161–171.
Companions in Guilt Arguments and Moore’s Paradox.Michael Campbell - forthcoming - Symposion. Theoretical and Applied Inquiries in Philosophy and Social Sciences.
Objectivity and Evaluation.Justin Clarke-Doane - 2020 - In Christopher Cowie & Rach Cosker-Rowland, Companions in Guilt: Arguments in Metaethics. Routledge. pp. 105-17.
Good News for Moral Error Theorists: A Master Argument Against Companions in Guilt Strategies.Christopher Cowie - 2016 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 94 (1):115-130.
Why Companions in Guilt Arguments Won't Work.Christopher Cowie - 2014 - Philosophical Quarterly 64 (256):407-422.
Analytics
Added to PP
2009-07-17
Downloads
969 (#57,533)
6 months
137 (#93,337)
2009-07-17
Downloads
969 (#57,533)
6 months
137 (#93,337)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Moral Error Theory: History, Critique, Defence.Jonas Olson - 2014 - Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Good News for Moral Error Theorists: A Master Argument Against Companions in Guilt Strategies.Christopher Cowie - 2016 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 94 (1):115-130.
Why Companions in Guilt Arguments Won't Work.Christopher Cowie - 2014 - Philosophical Quarterly 64 (256):407-422.
Pain for the Moral Error Theory? A New Companions-in-Guilt Argument.Guy Fletcher - 2017 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 96 (3):474-482.
Try MATCHA Writer if you're interested in citing directly from PhilPapers and certifying your authorship.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation