Justice: Real or Social?

Social Philosophy and Policy 1 (1):151 (1983)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I At one point in Taking Rights Seriously, Ronald Dworkin sketches an argument which would today be widely acceptable. He writes: “The University of Washington might argue that, whatever effect minority preference will have on average welfare, it will make the community more equal, and therefore more just.” It is perhaps not certain that Dworkin himself accepts that immediate inference as sound. There can, however, be no doubt but that: first, many if not most people speaking or writing today in this area do indeed take ‘equality’ to be as near as makes no matter synonymous with ‘equity’; and, second, they do indeed also identify doing justice with bringing about equality of condition

Other Versions

No versions found

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-31

Downloads
125 (#367,094)

6 months
5 (#1,609,967)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Meeting Needs: charity or justice?Antony Flew - 1988 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 5 (2):225-231.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Anarchy, State, and Utopia.Robert Nozick - 1974 - Philosophy 52 (199):102-105.
Theory of Justice: Reply to Lyons and Teitelman.John Rawls - 1972 - Journal of Philosophy 69 (18):556.
Justice as equality.Christopher Ake - 1975 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 5 (1):69-89.

View all 8 references / Add more references