Accuracy, Language Dependence, and Joyce’s Argument for Probabilism

Philosophy of Science 79 (1):167-174 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this article, I explain how a variant of David Miller's argument concerning the language dependence of the accuracy of predictions can be applied to Joyce's notion of the accuracy of “estimates of numerical truth-values”. This leads to a potential problem for Joyce's accuracy-dominance-based argument for the conclusion that credences should obey the probability calculus.

Other Versions

No versions found

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-02-07

Downloads
237 (#172,735)

6 months
19 (#572,430)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Branden Fitelson
Northeastern University

Citations of this work

The normative status of logic.Florian Steinberger - 2017 - Stanford Enyclopedia of Philosophy.
You've Come a Long Way, Bayesians.Jonathan Weisberg - 2015 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 44 (6):817-834.
Approaching Truth in Conceptual Spaces.Gustavo Cevolani - 2020 - Erkenntnis 85 (6):1485-1500.

View all 7 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

A nonpragmatic vindication of probabilism.James M. Joyce - 1998 - Philosophy of Science 65 (4):575-603.
Objective Knowledge.K. R. Popper - 1972 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 4 (2):388-398.
Objective knowledge, an evolutionary approach.Karl R. Popper - 1974 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 166 (1):72-73.
The identity of indiscernibles.Ian Hacking - 1975 - Journal of Philosophy 72 (9):249-256.
The accuracy of predictions.David Miller - 1975 - Synthese 30 (1-2):159 - 191.

View all 6 references / Add more references