Yet Another Ideal Version of the Bounding Number

Journal of Symbolic Logic 87 (3):1065-1092 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Let $\mathcal {I}$ be an ideal on $\omega $. For $f,\,g\in \omega ^{\omega }$ we write $f \leq _{\mathcal {I}} g$ if $f(n) \leq g(n)$ for all $n\in \omega \setminus A$ with some $A\in \mathcal {I}$. Moreover, we denote $\mathcal {D}_{\mathcal {I}}=\{f\in \omega ^{\omega }: f^{-1}[\{n\}]\in \mathcal {I} \text { for every } n\in \omega \}$ (in particular, $\mathcal {D}_{\mathrm {Fin}}$ denotes the family of all finite-to-one functions).We examine cardinal numbers $\mathfrak {b}(\geq _{\mathcal {I}}\cap (\mathcal {D}_{\mathcal {I}} \times \mathcal {D}_{\mathcal {I}}))$ and $\mathfrak {b}(\geq _{\mathcal {I}}\cap (\mathcal {D}_{\mathrm {Fin}}\times \mathcal {D}_{\mathrm {Fin}}))$ describing the smallest sizes of unbounded from below with respect to the order $\leq _{\mathcal {I}}$ sets in $\mathcal {D}_{\mathrm {Fin}}$ and $\mathcal {D}_{\mathcal {I}}$, respectively. For a maximal ideal $\mathcal {I}$, these cardinals were investigated by M. Canjar in connection with coinitial and cofinal subsets of the ultrapowers.We show that $\mathfrak {b}(\geq _{\mathcal {I}}\cap (\mathcal {D}_{\mathrm {Fin}} \times \mathcal {D}_{\mathrm {Fin}})) =\mathfrak {b}$ for all ideals $\mathcal {I}$ with the Baire property and that $\aleph _1 \leq \mathfrak {b}(\geq _{\mathcal {I}}\cap (\mathcal {D}_{\mathcal {I}} \times \mathcal {D}_{\mathcal {I}})) \leq \mathfrak {b}$ for all coanalytic weak P-ideals (this class contains all $\bf {\Pi ^0_4}$ ideals). What is more, we give examples of Borel (even $\bf {\Sigma ^0_2}$ ) ideals $\mathcal {I}$ with $\mathfrak {b}(\geq _{\mathcal {I}}\cap (\mathcal {D}_{\mathcal {I}} \times \mathcal {D}_{\mathcal {I}}))=\mathfrak {b}$ as well as with $\mathfrak {b}(\geq _{\mathcal {I}}\cap (\mathcal {D}_{\mathcal {I}} \times \mathcal {D}_{\mathcal {I}})) =\aleph _1$.We also study cardinals $\mathfrak {b}(\geq _{\mathcal {I}}\cap (\mathcal {D}_{\mathcal {J}} \times \mathcal {D}_{\mathcal {K}}))$ describing the smallest sizes of sets in $\mathcal {D}_{\mathcal {K}}$ not bounded from below with respect to the preorder $\leq _{\mathcal {I}}$ by any member of $\mathcal {D}_{\mathcal {J}}\!$. Our research is partially motivated by the study of ideal-QN-spaces: those cardinals describe the smallest size of a space which is not ideal-QN.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

More on yet Another Ideal Version of the Bounding Number.Adam Kwela - forthcoming - Journal of Symbolic Logic:1-16.
Around splitting and reaping for partitions of ω.Hiroaki Minami - 2010 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 49 (4):501-518.
The Nikodym property and filters on $$\omega $$.Tomasz Żuchowski - 2025 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 64 (5):705-735.
More on fréchet–urysohn ideals.Salvador García Ferreira & Osvaldo Guzmán - 2022 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 87 (2):829-851.
Cichoń’s Maximum with Evasion Number.Takashi Yamazoe - forthcoming - Journal of Symbolic Logic:1-31.
Filter‐Menger set of reals in Cohen extensions.Shuguo Zhang & Hang Zhang - 2024 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 70 (2):224-232.
Ways of Destruction.Barnabás Farkas & Lyubomyr Zdomskyy - 2022 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 87 (3):938-966.
Some remarks on category of the real line.Kyriakos Keremedis - 1999 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 38 (3):153-162.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-09-10

Downloads
65 (#921,845)

6 months
11 (#1,088,005)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

More on yet Another Ideal Version of the Bounding Number.Adam Kwela - forthcoming - Journal of Symbolic Logic:1-16.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Countable ultraproducts without CH.Michael Canjar - 1988 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 37 (1):1-79.
Cofinalities of countable ultraproducts: the existence theorem.R. Michael Canjar - 1989 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 30 (4):539-542.

Add more references