A Responsibility Model of Genetic Counseling

In Normative and Pragmatic Dimensions of Genetic Counseling: Negotiating Genetics and Ethics. Cham: Springer Verlag. pp. 47-78 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In the previous chapter, I introduced and elaborated the teaching and psychotherapeutic models of genetic counseling. The models were located within larger narratives from which they inherited distinct views of communication. I claim that the teaching model of genetic counseling is underwritten by the technical vision of communication; the psychotherapeutic model by the therapeutic vision of communication. Both are broadly situated in what John Durham Peters’ calls the spiritualist tradition. In this chapter I develop an alternative view that has been offered in the genetic counseling literature that places responsibility at the center of its approach. After introducing the responsibility model, I elaborate it in reference to a different philosophical story about communication whose details are worked out in Robert Brandom’s pragmatic model of conversational scorekeeping. These additional expressive resources are then used to flesh out the theses of the responsibility model.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-01-25

Downloads
20 (#1,832,724)

6 months
6 (#1,537,359)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references