Purpose, feedback, and evolution

Philosophy of Science 48 (2):198-217 (1981)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This essay develops a theory of natural signs in order to show how evolutionary theory breathes new life into teleology. An argument to the contrary presented by Richard Taylor is refuted. The essay defends the view that the concept of negative feedback explicates purposiveness and that symbiotic evolution explains the occurrence of naturally adapted feedback systems. But evolution itself is not a teleological process, nor is it a negative feedback system. There is an exploration of the nature of the dissatisfaction we feel with an evolutionary account of purposiveness from which the fortuitous cannot be eliminated

Other Versions

No versions found

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
155 (#271,576)

6 months
17 (#661,872)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Four ways of eliminating mind from teleology.Lowell Nissen - 1991 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 24 (1):27-48.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The propensity interpretation of fitness.Susan K. Mills & John H. Beatty - 1979 - Philosophy of Science 46 (2):263-286.
Action and Purpose.Richard Taylor - 1966 - Les Etudes Philosophiques 22 (2):237-237.
Purposeful and non-purposeful behavior: A rejoinder.Richard Taylor - 1950 - Philosophy of Science 17 (4):327-332.

Add more references