Psychoanalysis - myth or science?

Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 4 (1-4):1 – 15 (1961)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this paper an attempt is made to look at Freud's contribution from the point of view of its scientific validity. A factual survey is made of the results of psychoanalytic psychotherapy, of the kinds of facts and arguments used to support the psychoanalytic doctrine and of the experiments carried out to test it. The conclusion arrived at is that psychoanalysis and the theories associated with it is not a science, but a myth; adherence to it is based on emotion and prejudice rather than on fact and reason

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Gr nbaum and psychoanalysis.Margaret Nash - 1989 - Philosophical Psychology 2 (3):325 – 343.
Psychoanalysis as a Science by the Problem-solving Criterion.Aner Govrin - forthcoming - Philosophy Psychiatry and Psychology.
Ethics, metaphysics, and psychoanalysis.Campbell Crockett - 1961 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 4 (1-4):37 – 52.
Psychoanalytic ideas of leadership and modern ideas about its nature.Vadim Vladimirovich Komarov - 2023 - Известия Саратовского Университета. Новая Серия: Серия Философия. Психология. Педагогика 23 (2):198-202.
Psychoanalysis: Science of the Mind?Richard G. T. Gipps - 2018 - Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology 25 (2):113-118.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-02-04

Downloads
76 (#763,033)

6 months
5 (#1,638,944)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references