The Death We Owe (for) Beyng

Philosophies 11 (2):46 (2026)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article explores the role that death plays in Heidegger’s ontology after Being and Time, focusing especially on volumes 97–104 of the Gesamtausgabe. Within these volumes, death occupies a pride of place within Heidegger’s being-historical (and post-being-historical) attempts to articulate beyng, coming to play a role as significant as, and not unrelated to, the Nothing. In order to give a full accounting of the role that death plays within these texts, a number of other structurally significant terms within Heidegger’s Seinsdenken—such as Gebirg, Enteignis, Brauch, and Sage—will be examined. It is ultimately argued that these volumes, by exposing the human to the heretofore un-thought truth of beyng (as radical concealment), carry out the transition from “human” to “mortal” so essential to Heidegger’s later thinking.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2026-03-24

Downloads
11 (#2,044,222)

6 months
11 (#1,043,100)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Shane M. Ewegen
Trinity College

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references