Posthuman Rights: Dimensions of Transhuman Worlds

Teknokultura 12 (2):373-384 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

There are at least three dimensions to rights. We may have and lack freedom to 1) be, 2) do, and 3) have. These dimensions reformulate Locke’s categories, and are further complicated by placing them within the context of domains such as natural or civil rights. Here the question of the origins of rights is not addressed, but issues concerning how we may contextualize them are discussed. Within the framework developed, this paper makes use of Actor-Network Theory and Enlightenment values to examine the multidimensionality and appropriateness of animal rights and human rights for posthumans. The core position here is that rights may be universal and constant, but they can only be accessed within a matrix of relative cultural dimensions. This will be true for posthumans, and their rights will be relative to human rights and dependent on human and posthuman responsibilities.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-09-01

Downloads
945 (#59,495)

6 months
114 (#111,504)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Woody Evans
Texas Woman's University

References found in this work

Two treatises of government.John Locke - 1988 - New York: Cambridge University Press. Edited by Peter Laslett.
When Species Meet.Donna J. Haraway - 2007 - Univ Of Minnesota Press.
Two Concepts of Liberty.Isaiah Berlin - 2002 - In Liberty. Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press.
The social contract.Jean-Jacques Rousseau - 1968 - Harmondsworth,: Penguin Books. Edited by Charles Frankel.

View all 10 references / Add more references