Abstract

Really full blooded platonism (RFBP) is aimed to achieve a complete picture of the mathematical landscape by accepting inconsistent mathematics. I distinguish various senses of completeness relevant to the debate and argue that the move to inconsistency-tolerance might not be enough to achieve a complete picture of the mathematical landscape in any of those senses, for there is positive reason to endorse a richer Platonism with place for trivial parts in the mathematical landscape. © 2017 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.