How to depolarise the ethical debate over human embryonic stem cell research (and other ethical debates too!)

Journal of Medical Ethics 38 (8):496-500 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The contention of this paper is that the current ethical debate over embryonic stem cell research is polarised to an extent that is not warranted by the underlying ethical conflict. It is argued that the ethical debate can be rendered more nuanced, and less polarised, by introducing non-binary notions of moral rightness and wrongness. According to the view proposed, embryonic stem cell research—and possibly other controversial activities too—can be considered ‘a little bit right and a little bit wrong’. If this idea were to become widely accepted, the ethical debate would, for conceptual reasons, become less polarised

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-02-29

Downloads
138 (#318,171)

6 months
35 (#242,639)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Nicolas Espinoza
Stockholm University
Martin Peterson
Texas A&M University

References found in this work

A Theory of Justice: Original Edition.John Rawls - 1971 - Cambridge, MA and London, England: Harvard University Press.
Embryo Stem Cell Research: Ten Years of Controversy.John A. Robertson - 2010 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 38 (2):191-203.
Towards a global human embryonic stem cell bank.Jason P. Lott & Julian Savulescu - 2007 - American Journal of Bioethics 7 (8):37 – 44.

View all 6 references / Add more references