Whatever happened to medical politics?

Journal of Medical Ethics 37 (10):631-636 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper argues the case for coming to see ‘medical politics’ as a topic or subject within medical education. First, its absence is noted from the wide array of paramedical subjects (medical ethics, history of medicine, the medical humanities, etc) currently given attention in both the medical education literature and in specific curricula. Second the author suggests that ‘the political’ is implicitly recognisable in the historical roots of medical ethics education, specifically in certain of the London Medical Group's activities, and also that the medical profession, or indeed any profession, cannot be understood as an apolitical form of social organisation either in its institutional or scientific (epistemic) forms. Some brief suggestions for introductory and advanced topics in medical politics are discussed and the degree to which medical politics ought to be taken seriously and delivered as part of medical education is considered. Ultimately the author concludes that medical politics might be considered a useful subject within medical education, but it is perhaps best understood as a perspective or approach that can contribute to the development of a more expansive perspective within the extant paramedical subjects

Other Versions

No versions found

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-09-22

Downloads
121 (#385,398)

6 months
21 (#498,551)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Nathan Emmerich
Queen's University, Belfast (PhD)

References found in this work

The birth of bioethics.Albert R. Jonsen - 2003 - New York: Oxford University Press.
On Liberty and Other Essays.John Stuart Mill - 1991 - Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press. Edited by John Gray.

Add more references