Hard and Soft Obscurantism in the Humanities and Social Sciences

Diogenes 58 (1-2):159-170 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The paper argues that the contemporary social sciences and humanities are in a deep crisis, due to the prevalence of obscurantist arguments. Whereas many have denounced the “soft obscurantism” derived from what is sometimes called “French theory”, the “hard obscurantism” of many forms of mathematical and statistical social science also deserves to be singled out for criticism. The paper further argues that obscurantism does not merely represent a waste of intellectual effort, but has caused harm to countless individuals, ranging from parents of autistic children to market investors. Finally the paper considers some of the psychological mechanisms that may sustain obscurantism and constitute obstacles to overcoming it.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-07-12

Downloads
367 (#127,925)

6 months
40 (#211,883)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

A defense of reasonable pluralism in economics.Louis Larue - 2022 - Journal of Economic Methodology 29 (4):294-308.
Analytical Marxism.David Leopold - 2022 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Reference, Truth, and Biological Kinds.Marcel Weber - 2014 - In: J. Dutant, D. Fassio and A. Meylan (Eds.) Liber Amicorum Pascal Engel.

View all 17 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Sour Grapes: Studies in the Subversion of Rationality.Jon Elster - 1983 - New York: Editions de la Maison des sciences de l'homme.
Choices, Values, and Frames.Daniel Kahneman & Amos Tversky (eds.) - 2000 - Cambridge University Press.
On Bullshit.Harry G. Frankfurt - 1986 - Princeton: Princeton University Press.

View all 19 references / Add more references