Subjective Probabilities Should be Sharp

Philosophers' Imprint 10 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Many have claimed that unspecific evidence sometimes demands unsharp, indeterminate, imprecise, vague, or interval-valued probabilities. Against this, a variant of the diachronic Dutch Book argument shows that perfectly rational agents always have perfectly sharp probabilities.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-12-29

Downloads
547 (#100,928)

6 months
51 (#168,765)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Adam Elga
Princeton University

Citations of this work

Money-Pump Arguments.Johan E. Gustafsson - 2022 - Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Choosing for Changing Selves.Richard Pettigrew - 2019 - Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Evidence: A Guide for the Uncertain.Kevin Dorst - 2019 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 100 (3):586-632.

View all 207 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references