Angelaki 30 (2):68-78 (
2025)
Copy
BIBTEX
Abstract
This essay surveys and assesses Hegel’s general account of the role of crises in the formation of a culture of lived freedom. Ultimate resolution of crisis, according to Hegel, depends on a superintending divine agency that resolves the fractures, alienation, and competitive individualism of modern Enlightenment culture – a view that cannot be supported. Hegel’s specific analysis of that culture in the Phenomenology appears in the section on “Culturally Educated Spirit,” which includes his reading of Diderot’s Rameau’s Nephew. Following Alasdair MacIntyre, I argue that there is no straightforward general way for human agents to avoid succumbing at least in part to Lui’s self-professed mercenary individualism. The result is a culture of generalized alienation and dissatisfaction, in which crises of opposition are all at once universal, irresolvable, and insignificant in playing no role in the achievement of meaningful freedom. Modern self-making is important, but its polymorphic and mutually opaque varieties threaten to overwhelm any possibilities of involvement in joint, meaningful activity. (In Sartre’s terms, hell is other people.) Despite this bleak diagnosis, however, I gesture, drawing on Stanley Cavell’s Pursuits of Happiness, to possibilities of developing the skill of mutual appreciation, as an immanent teleology makes itself locally manifest within a relationship, surprisingly and in the face of crises of misunderstanding rooted in competitive-acquisitive individualism.