Does Fidelity to Revolutionary Truths Undo Itself?

Radical Philosophy Review 22 (1):59-84 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article examines Alain Badiou’s and Slavoj Žižek’s advocacy for fidelity to revolutionary truths in light of complex system theory’s understanding of resiliency. It begins with a discussion of how Badiou and Žižek describe truth. Next, it looks at the features that make a complex system resilient. The article argues that if we understand neoliberalism as a resilient system, then the fidelity to revolutionary truths that Badiou and Žižek advocate is not enough, for it doesn’t realize how truths come from the system as a whole. The article concludes by describing how this viewpoint alters discussions of political change.

Other Versions

No versions found

Similar books and articles

La déclaration d'Etat.Olivier Neveux - 2005 - Actuel Marx 38 (2):179-192.
Heroic Business ‘Ethics’.John Dobson & Eleanor Helms - 2014 - Business and Professional Ethics Journal 33 (2-3):131-146.
The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science | Vol 75, No 1.Mathieu Charbonneau - 2019 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 71 (4):1209-1233.
The Value of Fidelity in Adaptation.James Harold - 2018 - British Journal of Aesthetics 58 (1):89-100.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-01-02

Downloads
814 (#71,291)

6 months
155 (#80,262)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Nathan Eckstrand
Sam Houston State University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

S. - 2008 - In A. P. Martinich, A Hobbes Dictionary. Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 269-298.
The Parallax View.Slavoj ižek - 2006 - MIT Press.

View all 12 references / Add more references