Modernism and Postmodernism: Bernstein or Husserl [Book Review]

Review of Metaphysics 42 (2):275-300 (1988)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

A POSTMODERN THINKER might very well be dismayed by the suggestions embedded in my title that the breach between modernism and postmodernism can be overcome and that Husserl is at all relevant to a discussion of postmodernism. Has not, after all, the postmodern critique revealed once and for all the poverty of the modern philosophical tradition with its epistemological and foundationalist concerns? And what better example of a philosopher working in the modern tradition than Husserl, who clearly identifies his own philosophy as a form of "transcendental idealism" and who is clearly committed to the discovery of both an indubitable starting point upon which and a clear methodology by which philosophy can establish itself as a sure science of cognition?

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-05-29

Downloads
78 (#737,591)

6 months
10 (#1,124,960)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

John J. Drummond
Fordham University

Citations of this work

Hermeneutics: A protreptic.Gregory R. Johnson - 1990 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 4 (1-2):173-211.
On Welton on Husserl.John J. Drummond - 2003 - New Yearbook for Phenomenology and Phenomenological Philosophy 3:315-332.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references