Perspectival Dogwhistles

Topoi:1-19 (forthcoming)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper explores a previously undiscussed type of dogwhistle which we call perspectival dogwhistles. Standard covert effect dogwhistles involve two meanings, one of which is only available to those with the right background knowledge. The more commonly known meaning serves as cover for this one. In the case of perspectival dogwhistles, what is needed to discern the less-known meeting is not background knowledge but the right perceptual perspective. In general, this also results in an absence of plausible deniability, which is commonly attributed to dogwhistles (and sometimes treated as definitional). Our central example is one of AI-generated imagery using double-image effects, used to evade moderation. We also discuss “Satanic” backwards messages in music, subliminal advertising, and some manipulative safety vests for horse riding.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Understanding Dogwhistles Politics.José Ramón Torices - 2021 - Theoria : An International Journal for Theory, History and Fundations of Science 36 (3):321-339.
Brazen Dogwhistles.Kelly Weirich - 2025 - Apa Studies on Feminism and Philosophy 25 (1):18-25.
Linguistic Plausible Deniability.Mirela Fus-Holmedal - 2026 - Croatian Journal of Philosophy 25 (75):439-466.
Covert, Not Innocent—Narrowing the Reach of Saul's Account.Taylor Koles - 2025 - APA Studies in Feminism and Philosophy 25 (1):13-18.

Analytics

Added to PP
2026-04-03

Downloads
31 (#1,575,990)

6 months
31 (#297,550)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Jennifer Saul
University of Waterloo

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

How Propaganda Works.Jason Stanley - 2015 - Princeton University Press.
Dogwhistles, Political Manipulation, and Philosophy of Language.Jennifer Saul - 2018 - In Daniel Fogal, Daniel W. Harris & Matt Moss, New Work on Speech Acts. Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press. pp. 360–383.
Insinuation, Common Ground, and the Conversational Record.Elisabeth Camp - 2018 - In Daniel Fogal, Daniel W. Harris & Matt Moss, New Work on Speech Acts. Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press. pp. 40–66.

View all 22 references / Add more references