Retrying Galileo: 1633–1992

Review of Metaphysics 59 (2):419-420 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Without doubt the Galileo affair is one of the most studied events in the history of Western culture. The past four centuries have produced vast amounts of commentaries, countless interpretations and evaluations advanced by physicists, astronomers, theologians, philosophers, churchmen, historians, and even playwrights. Although the literature on the original affair is enormous, the story of the aftermath, says Finocchiaro, has never been told: “The reflective commentary has never been systematically examined, and the subsequent controversy has never been anchored in the textual sources.”

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Domingo de Soto and the Early Galileo. [REVIEW]Jude P. Dougherty - 2004 - Review of Metaphysics 57 (4):872-874.
Galileo, rationality and explanation.Joseph C. Pitt - 1988 - Philosophy of Science 55 (1):87-103.
Patterns of argumentation in Galileo's Discorsi.Marta Fehér - 1998 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 12 (1):17-24.
Patterns of argumentation in Galileo's discorsi.Marta Feh - 1998 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 12 (1):17 – 24.
Galileo and the Philosophy of Science.Maurice A. Finocchiaro - 1976 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1976:130 - 139.
Galileo vs Aristotle on free falling bodies.Markus Schrenk - 2004 - History of Philosophy & Logical Analysis 7 (1):1-11.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-01-09

Downloads
61 (#986,640)

6 months
21 (#500,262)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?