Concept Learning: Convexity Versus Connectedness

Erkenntnis 91 (1):445-462 (2026)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In the context of the conceptual spaces framework, it has been argued that a natural concept is represented by a convex region in a similarity space. The convexity requirement has been defended on grounds of cognitive economy: among other benefits, concepts represented by convex regions have been said to be easily learnable, or more easily than concepts represented by nonconvex regions. There is some evidence that concepts in use are represented by regions that are convex, or at least almost so. There is so far no evidence that concepts represented by convex regions are more easily learnable than ones represented by regions that satisfy topological criteria that are somewhat less stringent, most notably that of connectedness. This note presents the outcomes from computational studies carried out on perceptual color space as well as on a shape space for representing various container objects, indicating that convexity indeed facilitates learning more than does connectedness. The studies use the training of neural nets as a model of human learning.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-12-09

Downloads
71 (#831,714)

6 months
11 (#1,085,360)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Igor Douven
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique

Citations of this work

Add more citations