Curious Disappearances: Affectability Imbalances and Process‐Based Invisibility

Hypatia 29 (4):873-888 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this paper, we analyze the recent public scandal involving Nafissatou Diallo and Dominique Strauss-Kahn to offer an account of the role affectability imbalances play in process-based invisibility. Process-based invisibilities, in this paper, refer to predictable narrative gaps within public narratives that can be aptly described as disappearances. We demonstrate that compromised, complex social identities, maladjusted webs of reciprocity, and a failure to fully appreciate basic affectability in large part cause affectability imbalances. Ultimately, we claim that affectability imbalances and the three imbricated conditions that facilitate such imbalances—complex social identities, reciprocity, and basic affectability—are integral features of process-based invisibility.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-07-01

Downloads
139 (#314,952)

6 months
18 (#617,007)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Kristie Dotson
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor

Citations of this work

"Epistemic Reparations and the Right to Be Known".Jennifer Lackey - 2022 - Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 96:54-89.
Precarious Agency: The Role of Uptake.Mühlebach Deborah - forthcoming - Southern Journal of Philosophy:1-21.
Implicit Bias and Epistemic Oppression in Confronting Racism.Jules Holroyd & Katherine Puddifoot - 2022 - Journal of the American Philosophical Association 8 (3):476-495.

View all 10 citations / Add more citations