Inclusive Ends, Dominant Ends, and Politics

Process Studies 40 (2):260-278 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I have argued elsewhere that the overall method that is required in liberal political philosophy is that of reflective equilibrium and that this method can be best understood in processual terms. In the present article I try to show how neoclassical (and other) theists can bring their convictions to bear in a politically liberal society, within the confines of this method, in a rational (rather than irrational or mad) manner.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2025-11-21

Downloads
7 (#2,154,327)

6 months
5 (#1,607,410)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Daniel Dombrowski
Seattle University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Political Liberalism.John Rawls - 1993 - Columbia University Press.
Justice: Rights and Wrongs.Nicholas Wolterstorff - 2010 - Princeton University Press.
The Final Good in Aristotle's Ethics.W. F. R. Hardie - 1965 - Philosophy 40 (154):277-295.
Democracy on purpose: justice and the reality of God.Franklin I. Gamwell - 2000 - Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.

View all 9 references / Add more references