The paradoxical liberty of bio-power: Hannah Arendt and Michel Foucault on modern politics

Philosophy and Social Criticism 31 (3):369-380 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

For Hannah Arendt, spontaneous, ‘initiatory’ human action and interaction are suppressed by the normalizing pressures of society once ‘life’ - that is, sheer life - becomes the primary concern of politics, as it does, she finds, in the modern age. Arendt’s concept of the social is indebted to Martin Heidegger’s analysis of everyday Dasein in Being and Time, and contemporary political philosophers inspired by Heidegger, such as Jean-Luc Nancy, Philippe Lacoue-Labarthe, and Giorgio Agamben, tend to reproduce her account of the withdrawal of the political in modernity. In this article, I complicate Arendt’s theory by turning to Michel Foucault’s parallel but diverging understanding of the nature of power in modern society to show, surprisingly, that Foucault’s narrative of the emergence of modern power pictures a society that is more, not less, politicized. Key Words: Hannah Arendt • bio-power • Michel Foucault • Philippe Lacoue-Labarthe • modernity • Jean-Luc Nancy • pastoral power • the social • rulership.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
220 (#184,193)

6 months
39 (#212,600)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Frederick M. Dolan
University of California, Berkeley

References found in this work

The human condition [selections].Hannah Arendt - 2013 - In Timothy Campbell & Adam Sitze, Biopolitics: A Reader. Durham: Duke University Press.
The Question concerning Technology and Other Essays.Martin Heidegger & William Lovitt - 1981 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 12 (3):186-188.

View all 14 references / Add more references