Public Health and Precarity

International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics 13 (2):108-130 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

One branch of bioethics assumes that mainly agents of the state are responsible for public health. Following Susan Sherwin’s relational ethics, we suggest moving away from a “state-centered” approach toward a more thoroughly relational approach. Indeed, certain agents must be reconstituted in and through shifting relations with others, complicating discussions of responsibility for public health. Drawing on two case studies—the health politics and activism of the Black Panther Party and the work of the Common Ground Collective in post-Katrina New Orleans—we argue for the need to attend more carefully to the limitations of states and state-driven public health programs.

Other Versions

No versions found

Similar books and articles

Feminist Bioethics as Public Practice.Yolonda Wilson - 2022 - In Lee McIntyre, Nancy McHugh & Ian Olasov, A companion to public philosophy. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 53–64.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-09-02

Downloads
1,561 (#25,590)

6 months
201 (#56,840)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Michael Doan
Oakland University
Ami Harbin
Oakland University

Citations of this work

Hope and Feminist Theory.Katie Stockdale - 2025 - In Anthony Scioli & Steven C. van den Heuvel, The Oxford Compendium of Hope. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 699-713.
Public Health Virtue Ethics.Kathryn MacKay - 2022 - Public Health Ethics 15 (1):1-10.

Add more citations

References found in this work

When Doing the Right Thing is Impossible.Lisa Tessman - 2017 - New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Whither Bioethics Now? The Promise of Relational Theory.Susan Sherwin & Katie Stockdale - 2017 - International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics 10 (1):7-29.
Body and soul.A. Stevens - unknown - The Classical Review 62 (2).

View all 12 references / Add more references