The Dangers of ‘Best Practices’: Against Supposedly Revolutionary Theories of Evidence in Medicine

In Uri D. Leibowitz, Klodian Coko & Isaac Nevo, Philosophical Theorizing and Its Limits: Anti-Theory in Ethics and Philosophy of Science. Cham: Springer (2025)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Pain is a refractory problem in healthcare. One proposed solution is to promulgate best practices derived from the highest quality evidence stipulating how to assess pain and which treatment interventions are the most efficacious. Such a solution seamlessly integrates into evidence-based medicine, the dominant ‘revolutionary paradigm’ in healthcare. This paper argues that such a ‘revolutionary’ approach is theoretically untenable and ethically abhorrent. Section 1 adumbrates the evidence-based medicine framework, how best practices are often formulated under its auspices, and which methods it might use to address pain. Section 2 points out that this approach faces profound theoretical issues when applied to pain, even by its own lights. Section 3 argues that attempts to use such best practices in the clinic generate grave ethical problems. Finally, Sect. 4 briefly sketches a different form of medicine, one that casts evidence as a helpful handmaiden of medicine, instead of a domineering mistress.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2025-02-13

Downloads
78 (#737,632)

6 months
43 (#191,599)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

C. M. K. Djordjevic
London School of Economics

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references