Set—Theoretical Representations of Ordered Pairs and Their Adequacy for the Logic of Relations

Canadian Journal of Philosophy 12 (2):353-374 (1982)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

One of the most significant discoveries of early twentieth century mathematical logic was a workable definition of ‘ordered pair’ totally within set theory. Norbert Wiener, and independently Casimir Kuratowski, are usually credited with this discovery. A definition of ‘ordered pair’ held the key to the precise formulation of the notions of ‘relation’ and ‘function’ — both of which are probably indispensable for an understanding of the foundations of mathematics. The set-theoretic definition of ‘ordered pair’ thus turned out to be a key victory for logicism, providing one admits set theory is logic. The definition also was instrumental in achieving the appearance of ontological economy — since it seemed only sets were needed — although this feature was emphasized only later.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Reconsidering ordered pairs.Dana Scott & Dominic McCarty - 2008 - Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 14 (3):379-397.
The empty set, the Singleton, and the ordered pair.Akihiro Kanamori - 2003 - Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 9 (3):273-298.
Implementing Mathematical Objects in Set Theory.Thomas Forster - 2007 - Logique Et Analyse 50 (197):79-86.
Quine on explication and elimination.Martin Gustafsson - 2006 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 36 (1):57-70.
Existence of classes and value specification of variables.Hao Wang - 1950 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 15 (2):103-112.
About Metainferences.Federico Pailos & Bruno Da Ré - 2023 - In Federico Pailos & Bruno Da Ré, Metainferential Logics. Cham: Springer Verlag. pp. 9-27.
Cantorian set theory.Alex Oliver & Timothy Smiley - 2018 - Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 24 (4):393-451.
On the minimal cover property and certain notions of finite.Eleftherios Tachtsis - 2018 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 57 (5-6):665-686.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-05-29

Downloads
169 (#243,118)

6 months
20 (#564,349)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Randall Dipert
PhD: Indiana University, Bloomington; Last affiliation: University at Buffalo

Citations of this work

Peirce, frege, the logic of relations, and church's theorem.Randall R. Dipert - 1984 - History and Philosophy of Logic 5 (1):49-66.
Quine on explication and elimination.Martin Gustafsson - 2006 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 36 (1):57-70.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Word and Object.Willard Van Orman Quine - 1960 - Les Etudes Philosophiques 17 (2):278-279.
What numbers could not be.Paul Benacerraf - 1965 - Philosophical Review 74 (1):47-73.
The Principles of Mathematics.Bertrand Russell - 1903 - Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale 11 (4):11-12.
On the calculus of relations.Alfred Tarski - 1941 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 6 (3):73-89.
The plight of the platonist.Philip Kitcher - 1978 - Noûs 12 (2):119-136.

View all 11 references / Add more references