- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Informed Consensus: The Future of Respect for Persons in Biomedical Research
American Journal of Bioethics 25 (4):142-144 (2025)
Abstract
We agree with Barnes et al. (2025) that nonfungible tokens (NFTs), unique digital identifiers recorded on a blockchain, used to certify ownership and authenticity of specific assets, as popularized...Other Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
Towards a semantic blockchain: A behaviouristic approach to modelling Ethereum.Giampaolo Bella, Domenico Cantone, Marianna Nicolosi Asmundo & Daniele Francesco Santamaria - 2024 - Applied ontology 19 (2):143-180.
Challenges to Demonstrated Consent in Biobanking: Technical, Ethical, and Regulatory Considerations.Jasmine E. McNealy & Megan Doerr - 2025 - American Journal of Bioethics 25 (4):124-127.
Digital Inheritance in Web3: A Case Study of Soulbound Tokens and the Social Recovery Pallet within the Polkadot and Kusama Ecosystems.Justin Goldston, Tomer Jordi Chaffer, Justyna Osowska & Charles von Goins Ii - manuscript
Legal Nature of NFTed Artwork: A Comparative Study.Jia Wang & Arianna Alpini - 2024 - In Nadia Naim, Developments in Intellectual Property Strategy: The Impact of Artificial Intelligence, Robotics and New Technologies. Cham: Springer Verlag. pp. 65-90.
On the Complexities of Enabling Demonstrated Consent.Panagiotis Alexiou, Joel Azzopardi, Claude Julien Bajada, Jean-Paul Ebejer, Gillian M. Martin & Nikolai Paul Pace - 2025 - American Journal of Bioethics 25 (4):115-118.
Technologies Do Not Build Trust, People Do: A Critical Response to Promises of Trust in Biobanking Through Blockchain and Generative AI.Gabrielle Samuel, Faranak Hardcastle & Anneke Lucassen - 2025 - American Journal of Bioethics 25 (4):130-132.
Ambivalent Social Value and Different Understandings of Research in Shifting Biomedical Contexts.Martyn Pickersgill, Christopher Bunn, Lucinda Manda-Taylor & Myness Ndambo - 2025 - American Journal of Bioethics 25 (8):95-96.
Beyond Translation: Applicational Justice in Biomedical Innovation and Healthcare Delivery.Drew L. Cheng - 2025 - American Journal of Bioethics 25 (6):37-39.
Enabling Demonstrated Consent for Biobanking with Blockchain and Generative AI.Caspar Barnes, Mateo Riobo Aboy, Timo Minssen, Jemima Winifred Allen, Brian D. Earp, Julian Savulescu & Sebastian Porsdam Mann - 2025 - American Journal of Bioethics 25 (4):96-111.
Saving “Suffering”.Adriano Mannino & Nils Althaus - 2025 - American Journal of Bioethics 25 (8):48-51.
Analytics
Added to PP
2025-04-08
Downloads
53 (#1,123,870)
6 months
17 (#693,903)
2025-04-08
Downloads
53 (#1,123,870)
6 months
17 (#693,903)
Historical graph of downloads
References found in this work
Enabling Demonstrated Consent for Biobanking with Blockchain and Generative AI.Caspar Barnes, Mateo Riobo Aboy, Timo Minssen, Jemima Winifred Allen, Brian D. Earp, Julian Savulescu & Sebastian Porsdam Mann - 2025 - American Journal of Bioethics 25 (4):96-111.
Try MATCHA Writer if you're interested in citing directly from PhilPapers and certifying your authorship.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation