- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Voodoo epistemology
Abstract
A critical examination of Alvin Plantinga's attempted defense against the dreaded "Great Pumpkin Objection" to his theistic-belief-as-properly-basic religious epistemology.Author's Profile
Other Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
Against Plantinga's A/C Model: Consequences of the Codependence of the De Jure and De Facto Questions.Rebeka Ferreira - 2011 - Kent State University Graduate Philosophy Journal.
Epistemology in philosophy of religion.Philip L. Quinn - 2002 - In Paul K. Moser, The Oxford Handbook of Epistemology. New York, US: OUP Usa. pp. 513--538.
Warrant, defeaters, and the epistemic basis of religious belief.Christoph Jäger - 2005 - In Michael G. Parker and Thomas M. Schmidt, Scientific explanation and religious belief. Mohr Siebeck. pp. 81-98.
Can Religious Unbelief Be Proper Function Rational?Michael Czapkay Sudduth - 1999 - Faith and Philosophy 16 (3):297-314.
Critical Study of James K. Beilby, Epistemology as Theology: An Evaluation of Alvin Plantinga’s Religious Epistemology. [REVIEW]Tyler Wunder - 2007 - Philo 10 (2):168-186.
Against Alvin Plantinga's Reformed Epistemology: The Sufficiency of Evidence for the Belief in God.Alfie Polistico - 2021 - Philosophia: International Journal of Philosophy 22 (2):230-244.
The Sensus Divinitatis and Non-theistic Belief.Timothy Perrine - 2024 - Theology and Science 22 (4):739-756..
Modality, Probability, and Rationality: A Critical Examination of Alvin Plantinga's Philosophy.James Fulton Sennett - 1990 - Dissertation, The University of Nebraska - Lincoln
Analytics
Added to PP
2009-01-28
Downloads
109 (#449,677)
6 months
109 (#118,908)
2009-01-28
Downloads
109 (#449,677)
6 months
109 (#118,908)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Mackie vs Plantinga on the warrant of theistic belief without arguments.Domingos Faria - 2016 - Scientia et Fides 4 (1):77.
REFORMCU EPİSTEMOLOJİ: TEMEL UNSURLAR, İTİRAZLAR VE YENİ BAKIŞ AÇILARI.Musa Yanık - 2023 - Felsefe Dünyasi 1 (78):219-260.
Reasons to Believe - Theoretical Arguments.Marcus Hunt - 2020 - In Beau Branson, Hans Van Eyghen, Marcus Hunt, Tim Knepper, Robert Sloan Lee & Steven Steyl, Introduction to Philosophy: Philosophy of Religion. Rebus Community Press. pp. 22-33.
Try MATCHA Writer if you're interested in citing directly from PhilPapers and certifying your authorship.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation