Judge and Punish: The Penal State on Trial

Redwood City: Stanford University Press (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

What remains anti-democratic in our criminal justice systems, and where does it come from? Geoffroy de Lagasnerie spent years sitting in on trials, watching as individuals were judged and sentenced for armed robbery, assault, rape, and murder. His experience led to this original reflection on the penal state, power, and violence that identifies a paradox in the way justice is exercised in liberal democracies. In order to pronounce a judgment, a trial must construct an individualizing story of actors and their acts; but in order to punish, each act between individuals must be transformed into an aggression against society as a whole, against the state itself. The law is often presented as the reign of reason over passion. Instead, it leads to trauma, dispossession, and violence. Only by overturning our inherited legal fictions can we envision forms of truer justice. Combining narratives of real trials with theoretical analysis, Judge and Punish shows that juridical institutions are not merely a response to crime. The state claims to guarantee our security, yet from our birth, we also belong to it. The criminal trial, a magnifying mirror, reveals our true condition as political subjects.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Crime and Punishment.Lindsay Farmer - 2020 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 14 (2):289-298.
Kafka: Crime and punishment.Timo Airaksinen - 2019 - Ethics and Bioethics (in Central Europe) 9 (3-4):148-158.
Punishment and Justice.Jules Holroyd - 2010 - Social Theory and Practice 36 (1):78-111.
Punishing and Atoning: A New Critique of Penal Substitution.Brent G. Kyle - 2013 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 74 (2):201-218.
Review of Heidi Hurd, Moral Combat. [REVIEW]Thaddeus Metz - 2001 - Philosophical Review 110 (3):434-436.
The Presumption of Punishment.Shima Baradaran - 2014 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 8 (2):391-406.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-07-04

Downloads
43 (#1,315,496)

6 months
12 (#963,916)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Explanations and excuses in French sociology.Federico Brandmayr - 2021 - European Journal of Social Theory 24 (3):374-393.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references