The conceptual basis of numerical abilities: One-to-one correspondence versus the successor relation

Philosophical Psychology 21 (4):459 – 473 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In recent years, neologicists have demonstrated that Hume's principle, based on the one-to-one correspondence relation, suffices to construct the natural numbers. This formal work is shown to be relevant for empirical research on mathematical cognition. I give a hypothetical account of how nonnumerate societies may acquire arithmetical knowledge on the basis of the one-to-one correspondence relation only, whereby the acquisition of number concepts need not rely on enumeration (the stable-order principle). The existing empirical data on the role of the one-to-one correspondence relation for numerical abilities is assessed and additional empirical tests are proposed. In the final part, it is argued that the fact that the successor relation and the one-to-one correspondence relation can play independent roles in number concept acquisition may be a complication for testing the Whorfian hypothesis.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Is Correspondence Truth One or Many?Joseph Ulatowski - 2023 - Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia 79 (3):1003-1022.
On the Origin and Status of our Conception of Number.William Demopoulos - 2000 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 41 (3):210-226.
A Strengthening of the Caesar Problem.Joongol Kim - 2011 - Erkenntnis 75 (1):123-136.
Why cardinalities are the “natural” natural numbers.Mathieu Le Corre - 2008 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 31 (6):659-659.
The correspondence theory of truth.Mario Bunge - 2012 - Semiotica 2012 (188):65-75.
Cardinality, Counting, and Equinumerosity.Richard G. Heck - 2000 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 41 (3):187-209.
Berkeley, truth, and the world.Eric Bush - 1977 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 20 (1-4):205 – 225.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
147 (#290,882)

6 months
24 (#434,395)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Lieven Decock
VU University Amsterdam

References found in this work

A Treatise of Human Nature (1739-40).David Hume & D. G. C. Macnabb - 1739 - Mineola, N.Y.: Oxford University Press. Edited by Ernest Campbell Mossner.
A Treatise of Human Nature: Being an Attempt to Introduce the Experimental Method of Reasoning into Moral Subjects.David Hume - 1738 - Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press. Edited by David Fate Norton & Mary J. Norton.
Frege's conception of numbers as objects.Crispin Wright - 1983 - Aberdeen: Aberdeen University Press.
A treatise of human nature.David Hume - 2007 - In Elizabeth Schmidt Radcliffe, Richard McCarty, Fritz Allhoff & Anand Vaidya, Late modern philosophy: essential readings with commentary. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
The basic laws of arithmetic.Gottlob Frege - 1893 - Berkeley,: University of California Press. Edited by Montgomery Furth.

View all 15 references / Add more references