Cartesian analyticity

Southern Journal of Philosophy 26 (1):47-55 (1988)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The syllogism and the predicate calculus cannot account for an ontological argument in Descartes' Fifth Meditation and related texts. Descartes' notion of god relies on the analytic-synthetic distinction, which Descartes had identified before Leibniz and Kant did. I describe how the syllogism and the predicate calculus cannot explain Descartes' ontological argument; then I apply the analytic-synthetic distinction to Descartes’ idea of god.

Other Versions

No versions found

Similar books and articles

The importance of cartesian triangles: A new look at Descartes's ontological argument.M. V. Dougherty - 2002 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 10 (1):35 – 62.
Descartes's Ontological Proof of God's Existence.Cecilia Wee - 2012 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 20 (1):23-40.
Quine, analyticity and philosophy of mathematics.John P. Burgess - 2004 - Philosophical Quarterly 54 (214):38–55.
Proofs for the Existence of God.Lawrence Nolan & Alan Nelson - 2006 - In Lawrence Nolan & Alan Nelson, Proofs for the Existence of God. Oxford, UK: Blackwell. pp. 104--121.
Analyticity reconsidered.Paul Artin Boghossian - 1996 - Noûs 30 (3):360-391.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-15

Downloads
1,095 (#48,060)

6 months
135 (#94,900)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Jesus A. Diaz
Brown University (PhD)

References found in this work

S. - 2008 - In A. P. Martinich, A Hobbes Dictionary. Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 269-298.
Discourse on Method.Andrew R. Bailey & Ian Johnston - 2020 - Peterborough, CA: Broadview Press. Edited by Andrew Bailey.
H. - 1926 - Philosophical Review 35:66-76.
The Ontological Argument.Jonathan Barnes & Thomas Mcpherson - 1973 - Religious Studies 9 (4):488-490.
On predicating proper names.Michael Lockwood - 1975 - Philosophical Review 84 (4):471-498.

Add more references