On whether the buddhist 'syllogism' (par rth num na) is a Sui generis inference

Asian Philosophy 1 (2):175 – 183 (1991)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

­A Defense of Analogy Inference as Sui generis.André Juthe - 2020 - Logic and Logical Philosophy 29 (2):259-309.
Buddhism: A Modern Perspective.Charles S. Prebish (ed.) - 1975 - Pennsylvania State University Press.
Is vagueness Sui generis?David Barnett - 2009 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 87 (1):5 – 34.
Ramsey Sentences and Avoiding the Sui Generis.Frank Jackson - 2005 - In Hallvard Lillehammer & David Hugh Mellor, Ramsey's Legacy. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
Is Communication Emerging or Sui Generis?L. Leydesdorff - 2012 - Constructivist Foundations 8 (1):111-112.
Deductive, Inductive, Both, or Neither?Mark Siderits - 2016 - In Studies in Buddhist Philosophy. Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press. pp. 121-137.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
114 (#420,843)

6 months
13 (#895,072)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

A dictionary of philosophy.Antony Flew (ed.) - 1999 - New York: Gramercy Books.
P. - 1926 - Philosophical Review 35:122-145.
Buddhist Logic.E. B. & Th Stcherbatsky - 1964 - Journal of the American Oriental Society 84 (4):490.
Buddhist formal logic.R. S. Y. Chi - 1969 - Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.
A sixth-century manual of indian logic.Musashi Tachikawa - 1970 - Journal of Indian Philosophy 1 (2):111-145.

View all 15 references / Add more references