- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Reflections on My Experience in Human Research Ethics
Journal of Academic Ethics 7 (1-2):27-31 (2009)
Abstract
This paper was delivered at the 2009 annual conference of the National Council on Ethics in Human Research. It is a reflective piece based on many years of experience with human research ethics and the role of Research Ethics Boards in human participant research.Author's Profile
Other Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
Barriers to Research on Research Ethics Review and Conflicts of Interest.Bryn Williams-Jones, Marie-Josée Potvin, Ghislaine Mathieu & Elise Smith - 2013 - IRB: Ethics & Human Research 35 (5):14-20.
Determining the Level of Statistician Participation on Canadian-Based Research Ethics Boards.Lehana Thabane, Aaron Childs & Amanda Lafontaine - 2005 - IRB: Ethics & Human Research 27 (2):11.
Improving the process of research ethics review.Jeffrey Nyeboer & Stacey A. Page - 2017 - Research Integrity and Peer Review 2 (1).
Internet research ethics and the institutional review board: current practices and issues.Elizabeth A. Buchanan & Charles M. Ess - 2009 - Acm Sigcas Computers and Society 39 (3):43-49.
Protecting Human Research Subjects: Case-Based Learning for Canadian Research Ethics Boards and Researchers.Françoise Baylis, A. Ireland, David Kaufman & Charles Weijer - unknown
Cooperative research ethics review boards: a win-win solution?Greg Koski, Jessica Aungst, Joel Kupersmith, Kenneth Getz & David Rimoin - 2005 - IRB: Ethics & Human Research 27 (3):1.
Research Ethics Board (REB) Members’ Preparation for, and Perceived Knowledge of Research Ethics.Rylan Egan, Denise Stockley, Chi Yan Lam, Laura Kinderman & Alexandra S. Youmans - 2016 - Journal of Academic Ethics 14 (3):191-197.
Beyond Research Ethics: Dialogues in Neuro-ICT Research.Bernd Carsten Stahl, Simisola Akintoye, B. Tyr Fothergill, Manuel Guerrero, Will Knight & Inga Ulnicane - 2019 - Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 13:419547.
IRB, human research protections, and data ethics for researchers.Robin Throne (ed.) - 2025 - Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
The Low Risk Research Ethics Application Process at CQUniversity Australia.Teresa Moore & Kristy Richardson - 2013 - Journal of Academic Ethics 11 (3):211-230.
Analytics
Added to PP
2009-07-29
Downloads
106 (#469,891)
6 months
17 (#664,028)
2009-07-29
Downloads
106 (#469,891)
6 months
17 (#664,028)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Research Ethics Board (REB) Members’ Preparation for, and Perceived Knowledge of Research Ethics.Rylan Egan, Denise Stockley, Chi Yan Lam, Laura Kinderman & Alexandra S. Youmans - 2016 - Journal of Academic Ethics 14 (3):191-197.
Academic Guidance in Medical Student Research: How Well Do Supervisors and Students Understand the Ethics of Human Research?Kathryn M. Weston, Judy R. Mullan, Wendy Hu, Colin Thomson, Warren C. Rich, Patricia Knight-Billington, Brahmaputra Marjadi & Peter L. McLennan - 2016 - Journal of Academic Ethics 14 (2):87-102.
Try MATCHA Writer if you're interested in citing directly from PhilPapers and certifying your authorship.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation