Rationality, coherence, convergence: A critical comment on Michael Smith's ethics and the a priori

Philosophical Books 48 (2):99-108 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-10

Downloads
193 (#209,332)

6 months
12 (#966,368)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

David Enoch
Hebrew University of Jerusalem

Citations of this work

Neo‐Humean Rationality and two Types of Principles.Caj Strandberg - 2024 - Analytic Philosophy 65 (2):256-273.
Is reflective equilibrium enough?Thomas Kelly & Sarah McGrath - 2010 - Philosophical Perspectives 24 (1):325-359.
How is Moral Disagreement a Problem for Realism?David Enoch - 2009 - The Journal of Ethics 13 (1):15-50.
Moral Realism without Convergence.Sarah McGrath - 2010 - Philosophical Topics 38 (2):59-90.

View all 12 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Explaining action.Kieran Setiya - 2003 - Philosophical Review 112 (3):339-393.
The metaethical problem.Geoffrey Sayre-McCord - 1997 - Ethics 108 (1):55-83.
Do the desires of rational agents converge?David Sobel - 1999 - Analysis 59 (3):137–147.

Add more references