Common Morality, Coherence, and the Principles of Biomedical Ethics

Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 13 (3):219-230 (2003)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

: The fifth edition of Beauchamp and Childress's Principles of Biomedical Ethics is distinguished by its emphatic embrace of common morality as the ultimate source of moral norms. This essay critically evaluates the fifth edition's discussion of common morality and, to a lesser extent, its treatment of coherence (both the model of ethical justification and the associated concept). It is argued that the book is overly accommodating of existing moral beliefs. The paper concludes with three suggestions for improving this leading text.

Other Versions

No versions found

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
248 (#166,583)

6 months
42 (#196,812)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

David DeGrazia
George Washington University

Citations of this work

Hippocratic, religious, and secular ethics: The points of conflict.Robert M. Veatch - 2012 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 33 (1):33-43.
Industrial Farm Animal Production: A Comprehensive Moral Critique.John Rossi & Samual A. Garner - 2014 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 27 (3):479-522.
Beneficence, Justice, and Health Care.J. Paul Kelleher - 2014 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 24 (1):27-49.
Accounting for Culture in a Globalized Bioethics.Patricia Marshall & Barbara Koenig - 2004 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 32 (2):252-266.

View all 20 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references