Knowledge and Mystery

Journal of Philosophy, Science and Law 10:10-25 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The article, meant to address philosophers and scientists as well as the interested layman, expresses the views of a physicist on the strong impact that contemporary science has on the traditional approach to metaphysics, implying an in-depth revision of many concepts that have been happily used for centuries. The implications of taking seriously the main message of contemporary neurosciences – there is nothing else than interacting atoms in our brains – are explored. Free will, and its reconciliation with scientific determinism, is used as an illustration. Contemporary science has shed new light on the circularity of knowledge and allows for a clearer separation between science and metaphysics, between knowledge and religious beliefs. At the same time it reveals the fundamental inability of knowledge at unravelling mysteries such as knowing why the world exists, rather than nothing.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Perspectives of and Challenges for a Social Philosophy of Science.Alexander Ruser - 2015 - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 45 (3):54-64.
Scientific knowledge: a sociological analysis.Barry Barnes - 1996 - London: Athlone. Edited by David Bloor & John Henry.
In What Sense Is Scientific Knowledge Collective Knowledge?Hyundeuk Cheon - 2014 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 44 (4):407-423.
Policing knowledge: Disembodied policy for embodied knowledge.Joseph Rouse - 1991 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 34 (3):353-364.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-02-14

Downloads
32 (#1,553,527)

6 months
10 (#1,124,960)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations