Rationality and distribution in the socialist economy

Dissertation, University of Glasgow (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The thesis provides a philosophically grounded account of a socialist planned economy. While I do not primarily consider a positive case for socialism, I address two major objections to it and thus argue that the possibility of socialism as an alternative form of economic organisation has been dismissed too quickly. Furthermore, I provide an account of the precise form a socialist economy should take, outlining general principles of planning and distribution. Based on a welfarist interpretation of Marx, I show that distribution of consumer goods should be facilitated by an equal distribution of tokens. These tokens can be redeemed for consumer products or substituted for additional leisure time. The rates at which tokens can be redeemed for consumer products should correspond to market clearing prices. Welfare-oriented socialism is also defended against a deontological objection to socialism by Robert Nozick, who claims that socialism leads to injustice because it violates private property rights. The thesis also considers Ludwig von Mises’s calculation argument against socialism, which claims that socialism leads to the abolition of economic rationality. I show how this objection can be overcome by using optimal planning techniques which are responsive to consumer demand as signalled by the market clearing rates of consumer products. The resulting model of socialism is tested using a computer simulation. The simulation also demonstrates that a novel system of valuation based on opportunity cost leads to a better adaptation of production in response to environmental constraints when compared to the labour values of classical political economy.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Schumpeter, Socialism, and Irony.John Kilcullen - 2017 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 29 (4):415-446.
So Why Not Socialism?Daniel Halliday & John Thrasher - 2020 - In Daniel Halliday & John Thrasher, The Ethics of Capitalism: An Introduction. New York, US: Oup Usa. pp. 82-105.
On Hayek’s confutation of market socialism.Robert Nadeau - 2011 - Nuova Civiltà Delle Macchine 29 (1/2):213-238.
Socialism.Samuel Arnold - 2016 - Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Socialism.Andreas Albertsen & Jens Jørund Tyssedal - 2024 - Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics.
Value, Markets and Socialism.W. Paul Cockshott & Allin F. Cottrell - 1997 - Science and Society 61 (3):330-357.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-12-11

Downloads
140 (#311,193)

6 months
13 (#932,908)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Democratic Theory and Economic Planning.Jan Philipp Dapprich - 2024 - Erasmus Journal for Philosophy and Economics 17 (2):aa-aa.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Famine, Affluence, and Morality.Peter Singer - 1972 - Oxford University Press USA.
Leviathan.Thomas Hobbes - 1968 - Harmondsworth,: Penguin Books. Edited by C. B. Macpherson.
Utilitarianism.John Stuart Mill - 1861 - Cleveland: Oxford University Press UK. Edited by Roger Crisp.
Famine, affluence, and morality.Peter Singer - 1972 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 1 (3):229-243.
Value in ethics and economics.Elizabeth Anderson - 1993 - Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

View all 48 references / Add more references