- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Trojan Horses, Clinical Utility, and Parfitian Puzzles
American Journal of Bioethics 22 (9):16-18 (2022)
Abstract
There is a burgeoning corner of the philosophical literature on germline gene editing (GGE) about whether GGE is “person-affecting” or “identify-affecting.” The distinction between actions that aff...Author's Profile
Other Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
Germline genome editing versus preimplantation genetic diagnosis: Is there a case in favour of germline interventions?Robert Ranisch - 2019 - Bioethics 34 (1):60-69.
Germline Genome Editing May Never Have Any Clinical Utility.Bryan Cwik - 2025 - American Journal of Bioethics 25 (4):1-2.
The Ethics of Germline Gene Editing.Gyngell Christopher, Douglas Thomas & Savulescu Julian - 2017 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 34 (4):498-513.
The Ethical Status of Germline Gene Editing in Future Space Missions: The Special Case of Positive Selection on Earth for Future Space Missions.Konrad Szocik - 2023 - NanoEthics 17 (1):1-10.
Human Germline Genome Editing in the Clinical Context.Giovanni Rubeis - 2018 - In Matthias Braun, Hannah Schickl & Peter Dabrock, Between Moral Hazard and Legal Uncertainty: Ethical, Legal and Societal Challenges of Human Genome Editing. Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden. pp. 149-160.
Affecting future individuals: Why and when germline genome editing entails a greater moral obligation towards progeny.Davide Battisti - 2021 - Bioethics 35 (5):487-495.
Rewriting the genetic bond: Gene editing and our understanding of genetic parenthood.Shelly Simana & Vardit Ravitsky - 2022 - Bioethics 37 (3):265-274.
Risks and benefits of human germline genome editing: An ethical analysis.Giovanni Rubeis & Florian Steger - 2018 - Asian Bioethics Review 10 (2):133-141.
Is germline genome‐editing person‐affecting or identity‐affecting, and does it matter?Andrew McGee & Sinead Prince - 2025 - Bioethics 39 (3):250-258.
Revising, Correcting, and Transferring Genes.Bryan Cwik - 2020 - American Journal of Bioethics 20 (8):7-18.
Analytics
Added to PP
2022-08-31
Downloads
78 (#736,600)
6 months
11 (#1,088,005)
2022-08-31
Downloads
78 (#736,600)
6 months
11 (#1,088,005)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
References found in this work
On the Plurality of Worlds.David Lewis - 1986 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 178 (3):388-390.
The Non-Identity Problem and the Ethics of Future People.David Boonin - 2014 - Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press.
Altered Inheritance: CRISPR and the Ethics of Human Genome Editing.Françoise Baylis - 2019 - Cambridge, MA and London, England: Harvard University Press.
Human Germline Genome Editing: On the Nature of Our Reasons to Genome Edit.Robert Sparrow - 2021 - American Journal of Bioethics 22 (9):4-15.
Try MATCHA Writer if you're interested in citing directly from PhilPapers and certifying your authorship.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation