Objections to Aid

In The Moral Demands of Affluence. Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press UK (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Various arguments are often given for thinking that aid agencies do no overall good to the poor. The economic and political grounds for thinking this are surveyed in this chapter. It is argued that the claims needed for a cogent objection to humanitarian aid are too strong to be plausible. And even if they were right, they would at most show that we should be helping in some ways rather than others: they would not show that there is nothing we can do to help.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Objections to Aid.Garrett Cullity - 2006 - In The Moral Demands of Affluence. Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press UK. pp. 34-53.
Rethinking Singer: Toward a valid argument for helping the global poor.Joshua Luczak - 2025 - Ethics and Bioethics (in Central Europe) 15 (3-4):220-232.
Rescue and the Duty to Aid.Violetta Igneski - 2001 - Dissertation, University of Toronto (Canada)
Guilt, God and Perfection, II.Paul Weiss - 1954 - Review of Metaphysics 8 (2):246 - 263.
Taking Stock, Clarifications, and Further Thoughts.Larry S. Temkin - 2022 - In Being Good in a World of Need. Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press. pp. 294-316.
Transnational medical aid and the wrongdoing of others.Keith Horton - 2008 - Public Health Ethics 1 (2):171-179.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-10-25

Downloads
83 (#675,597)

6 months
18 (#647,875)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Garrett Cullity
Australian National University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references