Was Carnap a Complete Verificationist in the Aufbau?

Abstract

It is argued that Carnap was not a complete verificationist in the Aufbau despite the widespread view that he was. That doctrine would be intrinsic to constructionalism only if either of two additional assumptions are made, and there is no reason to believe that Carnap made these assumptions. Further, in the Aufbau Carnap did not demand verifiability independently of constructionalism, and his clear rejection of verifiability in Pseudoproblems counts heavily against his ever having accepted it in the Aufbau.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The justification of concepts in Carnap's aufbau.Jonathan Y. Tsou - 2003 - Philosophy of Science 70 (4):671-689.
A reserved reading of Carnap's aufbau.Christopher Pincock - 2005 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 86 (4):518–543.
Designation and Convention: A Chapter of Early Logical Empiricism.Thomas A. Ryckman - 1990 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1990:149 - 157.
Anomalous monism in Carnap's aufbau.Mehdi Nasrin - 2004 - Erkenntnis 60 (3):283-293.
How Not to Russell Carnap's Aufbau.Alan Richardson - 1990 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1990:3-14.
The 'Umbau' - from Constitution Theory to Constructional Ontology.Johanna Seibt - 1997 - History of Philosophy Quarterly 14 (3):305 - 348.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-05-29

Downloads
80 (#712,342)

6 months
9 (#1,214,406)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

Verificationism and (Some of) its Discontents.Thomas Uebel - 2019 - Journal for the History of Analytical Philosophy 7 (4):1-31.
Epistemology in the Aufbau.Michael Friedman - 1992 - Synthese 93 (1-2):15 - 57.
American Pragmatism and the Vienna Circle: The Early Years.Thomas Uebel - 2015 - Journal for the History of Analytical Philosophy 3 (3).
Vienna circle.Thomas Uebel - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
The American Reception of Logical Positivism: First Encounters, 1929–1932.Sander Verhaegh - 2020 - Hopos: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science 1 (10):106-142.

View all 11 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references