- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
“Sounds Fine, But No Thanks!”: On Distinguishing Judgments About Action and Acceptability in Attitudes Toward Cognitive Enhancement
American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 10 (1):57-59 (2019)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Author Profiles
Other Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
Authenticity or Risk?Jonathan Livengood & Justin Sytsma - 2024 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 15 (4):260-263.
Love Drugs and Academic Myth.Tomislav Furlanis, Laura Duplaquet & Frederic Gilbert - 2024 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 15 (4):253-255.
“Lovedrugs” May Be a Moral Imperative.Vojin Rakić - 2024 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 15 (4):244-245.
It Takes Two to Tango.Monique Lanoix - 2024 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 15 (4):258-259.
Moral Attitudes Toward Pharmacologically Assisted Couples Therapy: An Experimental Bioethics Study of Real-World “Love Drugs”.Mey Bahar Buyukbabani, Brian D. Earp, Ivar Hannikainen, Tommaso Barba, Emilian Mihailov, David B. Yaden & Julian Savulescu - 2024 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 15 (4):239-243.
Service and Status Competition May Help Explain Perceived Ethical Acceptability.Hugh Desmond - 2020 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 11 (4):258-260.
Cognitive Enhancement: Toward a Rational Public Consensus.Eman Ahmed & Kristien Hens - 2020 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 11 (4):263-265.
Attitudes Toward Cognitive Enhancement: The Role of Metaphor and Context.Erin C. Conrad, Stacey Humphries & Anjan Chatterjee - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 10 (1):35-47.
Context-Dependent Risk & Benefit Sensitivity Mediate Judgments About Cognitive Enhancement.Kiante Fernandez, Roy Hamilton, Laura Cabrera & John Dominic Medaglia - 2022 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 13 (1):73-77.
Prototypes or Pragmatics? The Open Question of Public Attitudes Toward Enhancement.Roland Nadler & Peter B. Reiner - 2011 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 2 (2):49-50.
Analytics
Added to PP
2019-05-10
Downloads
73 (#803,521)
6 months
11 (#1,088,005)
2019-05-10
Downloads
73 (#803,521)
6 months
11 (#1,088,005)
Historical graph of downloads
Author Profiles
Citations of this work
Public Opinion on Cognitive Enhancement Varies across Different Situations.Claire T. Dinh, Stacey Humphries & Anjan Chatterjee - 2020 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 11 (4):224-237.
Utilitarianism and the Moral Status of Animals: A Psychological Perspective.François Jaquet, Manon Delphine Gouiran & Florian Cova - forthcoming - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice.
References found in this work
Estimating the Reproducibility of Experimental Philosophy.Florian Cova, Brent Strickland, Angela Abatista, Aurélien Allard, James Andow, Mario Attie, James Beebe, Renatas Berniūnas, Jordane Boudesseul, Matteo Colombo, Fiery Cushman, Rodrigo Diaz, Noah N’Djaye Nikolai van Dongen, Vilius Dranseika, Brian D. Earp, Antonio Gaitán Torres, Ivar Hannikainen, José V. Hernández-Conde, Wenjia Hu, François Jaquet, Kareem Khalifa, Hanna Kim, Markus Kneer, Joshua Knobe, Miklos Kurthy, Anthony Lantian, Shen-yi Liao, Edouard Machery, Tania Moerenhout, Christian Mott, Mark Phelan, Jonathan Phillips, Navin Rambharose, Kevin Reuter, Felipe Romero, Paulo Sousa, Jan Sprenger, Emile Thalabard, Kevin Tobia, Hugo Viciana, Daniel Wilkenfeld & Xiang Zhou - 2018 - Review of Philosophy and Psychology 1:1-36.
The Actor–Observer Bias and Moral Intuitions: Adding Fuel to Sinnott-Armstrong’s Fire.Thomas Nadelhoffer & Adam Feltz - 2008 - Neuroethics 1 (2):133-144.
Discrepancies between Judgment and Choice of Action in Moral Dilemmas.Sébastien Tassy, Olivier Oullier, Julien Mancini & Bruno Wicker - 2013 - Frontiers in Psychology 4.
High levels of psychopathic traits alters moral choice but not moral judgment.Sébastien Tassy, Christine Deruelle, Julien Mancini, Samuel Leistedt & Bruno Wicker - 2013 - Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 7.
Try MATCHA Writer if you're interested in citing directly from PhilPapers and certifying your authorship.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation