Maclaurin on Occasionalism: A Reply to Ablondi

Journal of Scottish Philosophy 14 (1):125-135 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In a recent article Fred Ablondi compares the different approaches to occasionalism put forward by two eighteenth-century Newtonians, Colin Maclaurin and Andrew Baxter. The goal of this short essay is to respond to Ablondi by clarifying some key features of Maclaurin's views on occasionalism and the cause of gravitational attraction. In particular, I explore Maclaurin's matter theory, his views on the explanatory limits of mechanism, and his appeals to the authority of Newton. This leads to a clearer picture of the way in which Maclaurin understood gravitational attraction and the workings of nature.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-10-13

Downloads
163 (#254,156)

6 months
40 (#213,000)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Patrick J. Connolly
Johns Hopkins University

References found in this work

S. - 2008 - In A. P. Martinich, A Hobbes Dictionary. Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 269-298.
Philosophical writings.Isaac Newton - 2004 - Cambridge, UK ;: Cambridge University Press. Edited by Andrew Janiak.
Philosophical Writings.Margaret A. Simons, Marybeth Timmermann & Mary Beth Mader (eds.) - 2004 - University of Illinois Press.

Add more references