Modal Extensions of Sub-classical Logics for Recovering Classical Logic

Logica Universalis 7 (1):71-86 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this paper we introduce non-normal modal extensions of the sub-classical logics CLoN, CluN and CLaN, in the same way that S0.5 0 extends classical logic. The first modal system is both paraconsistent and paracomplete, while the second one is paraconsistent and the third is paracomplete. Despite being non-normal, these systems are sound and complete for a suitable Kripke semantics. We also show that these systems are appropriate for interpreting □ as “is provable in classical logic”. This allows us to recover the theorems of propositional classical logic within three sub-classical modal systems.

Other Versions

No versions found

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-03-10

Downloads
174 (#234,665)

6 months
58 (#154,847)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Marcelo Coniglio
University of Campinas

Citations of this work

Many-Valued Logics and Bivalent Modalities.Edson Bezerra & Giorgio Venturi - 2022 - Logic and Logical Philosophy 31 (4):611-636.

Add more citations

References found in this work

An essay in classical modal logic.Krister Segerberg - 1971 - Uppsala,: Filosofiska föreningen och Filosofiska institutionen vid Uppsala universitet.
The Logic of Provability.George S. Boolos - 1993 - Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.
Semantical Analysis of Modal Logic I. Normal Propositional Calculi.Saul A. Kripke - 1963 - Zeitschrift fur mathematische Logik und Grundlagen der Mathematik 9 (5‐6):67-96.
New foundations for Lewis modal systems.E. J. Lemmon - 1957 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 22 (2):176-186.
Algebraic semantics for modal logics I.E. J. Lemmon - 1966 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 31 (1):46-65.

View all 7 references / Add more references