Incorporeality: The ghostly body of metaphysics

Body and Society 6 (2):25--44 (2000)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

For the past two decades, the issue of the body and essentialism has dominated feminist theory. In general, it is assumed that the body has been devalued and repressed by the Western metaphysical tradition. In this article, I make two claims to the contrary. First, as poststructuralist theory has tirelessly demonstrated, Western thought has continually tried to ground thought in some foundational substance, such as the body. Second, the most provocative, fruitful and radical aspects of recent feminism and poststructuralism concern the event of incorporeality. What makes incorporeality such an urgent issue is its tie with anti-foundationalism. If there is not a direct or proper passage between what is and what is thought, then thinking can be considered as a force or event in its own right. By disrupting the traditional philosophical series that ties thought to some grounding body, thinkers as diverse as Deleuze, Derrida, Irigaray and Foucault have opened the possibility of a theory of the incorporeal.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Must God Be Incorporeal?David Paulsen - 1989 - Faith and Philosophy 6 (1):76-87.
Omnipresence and Incorporeality.Grace M. Dyck - 1977 - Religious Studies 13 (1):85-91.
The self and the body.Alfred Duhrssen - 1956 - Review of Metaphysics 10 (1):28-34.
Representational properties and mind-body identity.Arthur C. Danto - 1973 - Review of Metaphysics 26 (3):401-411.
Lived body and environment.Shaun Gallagher - 1986 - Research in Phenomenology 16 (1):139-170.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-11-02

Downloads
65 (#922,875)

6 months
5 (#1,609,967)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Claire Colebrook
Pennsylvania State University