Le Manuscrit de Kreuznach et l’ambiguïté de la démocratie sociale

Les Cahiers Philosophiques de Strasbourg 41:77-97 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The interruption of Marx’ Critique of Hegel’s Philosophy of Right indicates an ambiguity in the concept of social democracy which is identifiable in this text. Marx claims a transformation of state and society, which would delete the separation between these two spheres. However, the content that Marx gives to the social aspect of this transformation evolves over the manuscript. Marx thus moves from a social policy design, claiming a free public sphere, to a socio-economic theory of society, highlighting its self-organization by activity. This oscillation leads to the abandonment of the original thesis of the manuscript, its interruption, and the reorientation of the Marxian project of critique of politics.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

La République entre démocratie sociale et démocratie aristocratique, coll. « Questions ».Raymond Polin - 1998 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 188 (4):543-544.
Science sociale et démocratie. Essai de philosophie sociale.G. Duprat - 1901 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 51:206-210.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-11-23

Downloads
73 (#804,513)

6 months
26 (#366,767)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Pauline Clochec
University of Picardie

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Le libéralisme de Marx.Paulin Clochec - 2014 - Actuel Marx 56 (2):109-123.
Manuscrits économico-philosophiques de 1844.Karl Marx - 2007 - Librairie Philosophique Vrin.

Add more references